Nesting levels of intention

singular?

if transpires is a result of coherence

Buttoleneck we have very poor means of even articulating intentions

individually let alone co-laboratively

Capacity for symmathesy Mutual Learing is key

calibration

communication of interdependency

mutual learning

mutual arising

mutual recursion

https://twitter.com/TrailMarks/status/1455809360966389771

• for : Open Learning Commons

symmathesyofsymmathesies">symmathesy of symmathesies

• for : - byline : IndyVerse

recursive, fractal nature of

learning paths

https://hyp.is/lxIozit0EeufJSNF6E-4BQ/docdrop.org/video/7hyct4vgK4U/

understand

fractality

• for : Metaphysics of Adjacency

relational

mutual learning contexts

• for : IndieVerse realtional between beings

as subjects of human attention relations are related to

InterPersonal

coummunication and their provenance and growth iof mutual learning minds and externalized MindMeld

the Life of the Mind

system

does not communicate

contextual fields

of simultaneous learning

• for : byline - IndieVerse

multilayered shifting through time

verb

noun

Mutual Learning in a Living system

person and collective learning?

life of the mind?

10 years later

going

Inter

• Personal and
• Planetary

It is not semantics

we need Mutual learning Trails

TrailBlazers for Human InterIntellect Aumentation

Indy Learning commons

Symmathesy

Symmatheticist in the medium of Softwrae

Let People do it All For Themeselves

Knowledge Commons

is an ide that deeply resonates with me

I prefer the term Mutual Learning (Symmathesy)

or Open Leaarning Commons

and vernturing to create the Indy (Mutual) Learning Commons

Will be rading and annotating with great interest

The focus is not on content creation and management

but articulation/formulation of ideas externalization of human peron-first interpersonal intellect individually and co-laboratively scaling autonomous Human Mutual Learning symmathesy sacling significance, salient synthesis and reach

InterPersonal Mutual Learning

Symmathesy

Software is a Symmathetic Generative Conversation conversence about and for augmenting human capacity for mutual learning and co-lab-oration augmenting human capacity for consolience

Here to do How we understand ourselves in the world around us, that's like the central human

task. Like that's that's what we're here to do is to figure that out and to act accordingly.

understand to be understood

Loce to be Loved

Amour Mundi

cultivate an interest in the things u must do

Learn what u need to Learn and Learn It

Symmathesy mutual learning

Symmatheticist in the medium of Software

we all are

Software design and development is a Symmathetic conversation not just in but through the medium of software

another

.neologism of the day

PlexGraph

or

graphPlex

reimagining/extending the Mathematical concept of the Graph, beyond Hyper Graphs, so that it becomes a more expressive, capable, like Prolog did for Logic, do that for graph based organization of information and even beyond that,

All the important things that matter for computation had been abstracted away,

but our focus is the dual, interested in effective, nay affective constructs that can accomplish

something that is the closes one can get to Practical Magic in the medium of software and human2human and Human2computer interactions

representation/medium for managing/capturing complexity

nonlinear content in conPlexes

Symmathesy in the medium of Software

4

• symmathesy
• future orientation
  • with responsibility to dream to commit to realizing those in eventually emerging software systems that were first only imagingd dreamed bout
• medium of software

intentional dreamer in the medium of software

software is a symmathetic conversation in the medium of software

I would say symmanthesys where learning and weaving meaning and knowing supported by reasonable articulation of intention to the point of being real-ized in working sotware

all this merge in a Symmantehsys Universalis not to be accomplished by any one man

As Descartes wrote about his of Mathesis Universalis

Symmathesy

interoperability is not enough, This is viewing computer systems, the Universal Machines apart from the People the Universal Users. We forget that all these systems are supposed to serve us Humans not the other way round. We need to focus on human needs and capabilities first. Team human.

what is needed is inter-play-ability

Humans, Language Methods Artifacts and Tools! not Training in a mutual arising flows

so the concept should involve the mutual arising capabilities that are capable to augment in holonic way people documents and affordances together wo we have evergreen coevolutionary InterPersonal InterPlays

From this sweet spot view point that is just above the threshold of what is truly required everything just falls into place and anyone can figure out how to get there just follow its own reasonable logic to make it real

Many people are already working on it. Some call it Web4 or MAP - Memetic Activation Alatform. We call it the IndyVerse, the IndyWeb and IndraNet.work Spaces

One thing is common, that it all needs to be Open, Commons Based, Peer Produced scaling Autonomy, Trust, Reach Synthesis and Symmathesy (mutual Learning) and Augmenting Human InterIntellect.

Recognizing that Software is a Symmathetic conversations in the long tail of the Internet

https://hypothes.is/a/8F3DPCysEfCgqbsf-L70nw

The way 1 formulate/conceptualizes a problem delineate the space of conceivable solution.. If 1 finds the problem not to be ameanable to satisfying solutions 1 may need to re imagine reformulate the problem shift the focus to a wider scope perhaps

Peer to Peer trust is important but perhaps it needs to be anchored in a broader conceptualization

But how do we Scale Trust and Reach simultanously as we scale symmathesy nutual learning for Synthesis

Let the our understanding grow thorugh symmathesy and drive the autopoietic

means that let us evolve emergent solutios guided bu with the growth of understanding

Symmathesy

Hey @ConsilienceProject what would you all do if you had control of the Media? Ever ask that question? What kind of Consent do you want to Manufacture.

• non-blockchain architecture
  • distributed Hash Tables DHT
    • as opposed to Distributed Ledger Technology

for - distributed social application

• dApps
• hApps // what is required to complete it is interpersonal social networks AND autopoietic autonomous symmapoietic infrastructore for symmathesy, Open Mutual Learning Commons

to create the Indy Learning Commons

so that we can start symma-theetic/autopietic conversations about the way we can shape our tools to shape the way we can engage in

improving our ability to improve our "mutal collaboration cpabilities"

first.blikk

as you attempt to augment knowledge graphs

with a view to be able to track its co-evolution make comparisons, updates, refactor, regestalt etc

1 would discover that Graphs as a means of organizing knowledge is not enough

the widely used subject predicate object triples provide a tesselation that is not as expressive and powerful that we need

it is not a wuestion of representation but morphic intentional presentation nd articulating contexts

secondly it is not knowledge that we need to be able to manage

but symmathesy mutual learnings

see IndyPlex, Universail Hyper Topic Plexes and Maps

>>> I was doing a search on autopoiesis

• as this is at the heart of everything I do

including universal virtual

• machines
• human intents
• effective (affor)dances
• hyper documents long term info-communication-computational structures

trailmarks is not just

• thought veCtors in concept space but
• intent verctors in cyber (affor)Dance Spaces

MUTUAL ARISING of networked people and digital info communicationation and infrastructure for long term symmathesy and the growth of knowing interpersonal inter extellect

This is the closest articulation I encountered including th need to merge Poppers's World 3 which is THE SYMBOLOSPHERE (NOT OBJECTIVE BUT EXTERNALIZED ITER INTELELCT) AND pLANYI'S CONCEPT OF pERSONAL kNOWING

>> update WikiNizer was envisioned as a vehicle of personal knowledge work that is federated in and anchored in conceptipedia a federated gobal concept space

ten yeas later we are going interpersonal multiplayer autononomous collaboration

symmathesy Open Mutual Learning Commons

all while search engines are deteriorating in quality we need less second brains more collectively curated knowledge Networks

Actually co-curated mutual learning networks Symmathesy

• projects
• passion
• peers
• play

4 Ps for Cultivating Creativity Lifelong kindergarten

LifeLong Mutual Learning symmathesy&max=200">Symmathesy

symmathesy.png" alt="" />

not just part but

there could be a whole class of universal hyperdocument formats that can be used to specify and generate and process them all in meaningful intentional ways

But hat would not be the semantic sphere but the intentional sphere for symmathesy

Interpersonal

• reading
• social annotating and conversations starting on the margins
• threaded
• intentional
• interest based
• mission bearing pursuances
• conversational
• co-authoring
• co-evolutionary
• personal first
• offline first
• long term
• ambient
• autonomous
• private first
• commons based
• evergreen
• open
• FAIR
  • Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable,
• with full provenance
• recapitulable retraceble history of coevolution of ideas
• intertwingled mutual learning symmathesy

To get to this moment in the document, Engelbart had struggled past many requests for just such clever tricks. People around him imagined that computing would make this thing faster, that thing more comprehensive, that other thing more automatic. What people couldn't imagine was that computing could, if understood and used wisely, lead to a way of life in an integrated domain that could be more mindful and potentially more humane. A human-computer symbiosis that could be a greater force for good than we had yet seen. And sometimes that is indeed what has happened. And sometimes, spectacularly, not.

Nowadays, with deep digital and network literacies apparently on the decline, it seems that surveillance capitalism has become a nightmare inversion of the integrated domain. While most of us live our fragmented digital lives full of clever tricks that help in particular situations, sinister people who think largely about integrated domains engineer our entrapments, not the liberations Engelbart envisions here.

All the more reason to rewind to 1962 and read this remarkable document together.

hyp

4

• Open Learning Commons
• Open Knowledge Commons
• Open Symmathesy Commons

instead of worrying that

• Artificial Intelligence will soon come to

• dominate and govern the human world,

let us think of how it could help the human being to

• finally be able to do it

// harness emergent Artificial Intelligence

• in a man-machine symbiosis created
• for the people, by the people,
• for Human benefit first
• (not for the benefit of a few with the control of the machines designed to control humans)
  • which itself is a fools errand, born of the inability of honoring the complexity of the situation on a clear self-terminating path
• but by Flipping the prevailing paradigm of
• Augmenting the Machine's capabilities at the expense noit only of Human Potential, but actually limiting the capabilities of the machines and destroying the possibility of the emergence of collective synthesys of Human Intellect and Symmathesy for human benefit empowered by emergent externalization of human interintellect in aform that enables machine to manifest sythetic intellect capable of managing comkplexity for mutual benefit.

memetic engines

• improvement on the notion of "Semantic Engines"

where as what we need is

• Symmathetic Engines

see

• symmathesy%22%2C%22max%22%3A%22200%22%2C%22service%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fhypothes.is%22%2C%22exactTagSearch%22%3A%22true%22%2C%22expanded%22%3A%22true%22%2C%22addQuoteContext%22%3A%22true%22%2C%22format%22%3A%22html%22%2C%22_separate_replies%22%3A%22false%22%2C%22groupName%22%3A%22All%22%2C%22sortBy%22%3A%22recency%22%7D">symmathesy

we need : class-free objects

• not de-coupling but
• deep, high resolution, contextual, fine coupling
• organic growth of mixed- and matched context emergent extension of
• existing permanent evergreen capabilities
• mutual emergent extensibility via mix-ins

not dependency injection

• but mutual tinker-ability of existing capabilities
• reflect in the structure what we create symmathesy (mutual learning) as we articulate our intents
• Software is a Symmathetic conversation after all
• organic integral growth and co-evolution of autonomous,
• self explicating. open commons based, peer produced evergreen co-evolutionary capabilities
• augmenting cultural co-evolution itself

// this applies to information per se leading to

• reconceptualization of information iteself such that

1. attributed to source individual human being(s)
2. full recapitulable provenance, evergreen permanence
3. structured in universal ways as associative complexes
4. Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable
5. self-organizing, autopoietic
6. shared and presented in self-described evergreen morphic ways

given that we have a concept that is best referred to

as in-formation that flows in emergent human trust networks

that we fashion for ourselves as human being articulating our Tacit awareness

scaling synthesis recapitulating in the ontogeny of learning the filogeny of co-evolving emergent knowledge as hyperknowledge

scaling reach through time with the ability to find through global search work that mathces our current focal awareness and attention

in stigmergic symmathesy (mutual learning)

in a form that allows interpersonal sharing

to in-form and shape US

• shape our evolutionary path

• bond cooperativ I-spaces, without binding us

• technology in service of life

adopt

• open-ended
• person-centric architecural framework

invert

• power assymetry

scaffold

• trust

ratchet

• trust and cooperation
  • // build for trust, from trust( but verify)

foster

• interoperavility
• co-evolvability
• scallability
  • // scaling reach, participation, synthesis, symmathesy
• usability

// intertwingled propositiojnal trailmarked plexes

is something like an

• inexhaustible intelligibility so that
• something is real to us
• if we can continually find out more about it and in a way that is intelligible and

inexhaustible to us and so i take it that the ultimate source of realness is some kind of

inexhaustible source of intelligibility

// mark the salient rhyme and reason

• of what we encounter - capture it through

augmented writing and conversations

for

symmathesy">symmathesy

// trail cards

work with - partners to

• understand their community’s needs and challenges,
• solve them together.

The opportunity

to co-develop technology

this way is rare and valuable 🤝

/ resonate with vision task and mission of

• bootstrapping
• Open Commons-based, peer production of interpersonal autonomous constellations supporting
• stigmergic, synnergetic symmathesy and the co-creatioin, co-evolution of of Personal firstt, Open, Interoperable and ubiqutous sotware and tools needed to support and scale it in the long tail

There is more to knowing/learning that can be dreamt of in a semantic conceptualization of the task

Not to mention that it is not knowledge base we need in the first place

It symmathesy

https://hyp.is/y15NwLH-Ee2Upw-thChvcQ/nosweatshakespeare.com/quotes/famous/there-are-more-things-in-heaven-and-earth/

We call it Open (Mutual) Learning Commons or commons-based, peer prodduced, Autnonomous Stigmergic Symmathesy scaling synergic synthesis and articulation

Use Trailmarks notation to weave your own conceptual framework around your interests and thought vectors in your own concept space.

Then engaghe in conversations and collaboration in m aking them communicable if nbot commensurate, or be able to highlight the fundamental points of divergence in view points.

!- goal : IndyWeb

• intentional conversation
• intentional constellations
• autononomous People Centered HyperMedia Spaces

Everything is a conversation. Symmathesy mutual learning

Software is an Intentional conversation about Intents, with the intent of creating machine support for whatever wee need

We are working to create that new cosmology of Intentional Software on/as the InterPersonal Web we call the IndyWeb, built on top of the Web3 "Convergence Stack "IPFS and other decent(ralized) tech

!- concept : wiki to 'go viral'

• stub : as a means of active digital collaboration
• suggest using the phrase 'scaling reach' instead of 'going viral'
• this is important for n reasons
• - Scaling Reach (rermember freedom of speech is a matter of autonomy facilitated freedom of reach) emerging from the long tail of People's Networks and should = combine with
• - Scaling Coherence and
• - Scaling Synthesis or even Scaling Synthesys
• - Scaling Symmathesy (mutual learning) in Weaving the Open Learning Commons

!- combine : Fedwiki - with: IndyThreads - on the :IndyWeb

• stub : Trusted networks of conversations over the web

We need to build systems for Augmenting Human Intellect. http://1962paper.org/web.html#annotations:1i1anAwMEeutPrtso0kK7w To realise Engelbart's Dream debuted 60 years ego

Need to figure out how we can "improve the intellectual effectiveness of the individual human being" and build a People Centred internet, the IndyWeb, that works for the people by the people

where each individual can be their own autonomous hub, empowered to weave their own networks of people ideas and pursuits, to engage in deep conversations, mutual learning for the benefit of participants, in trusted but verifiable networks of evergreen Autonomous Ambient Digital Spaces through which all can experience the Web as an extension of their Minds. Create an Open Learning/Doing Commons where

ideas can self-organize, contextualized, their growth is recapitulable and attributable with full provenance not only of contributions but sharing, accelerating co-evolution for Symmathesy.

This way Augmented Human Identity will take care of itself.

Backus's work alongside John Allen's Anatomy of Lisp book discussing Syntax Directed Translation, and Abelson and Sussman's Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs inspired my PhD on "Language-Oriented Programming in Meta-Lisp" at Leeds University.

Revisiting this paper allows me to articulate on the margin the ideas relating to a revival of Simomnyi;s intentional software, based on the recognition that Software is a conversation about intents and a matter of Mutual Learning Symmathesy.

The original motivation for managing complexity by maintaining referential transparency and intellectual manageability over the past two decades, inspired by the works of Douglas Engelbart, Ted Nelson, Alan Kay and Ward Cunningham, evolved into the recognition of the need to developing means that augment the intellectual effectiveness of the individual human being and bootstrap collaboration co-creation of co-evolution of man-computer symbiotic systems.

To the extent that Philosophy's self image is that it is but footnotes to Plato (please insert your all time favourite philosopher of the day, I would say Hegel)

Then clearly the best way to go about doing philosophy must be writings on the margins of the greats and crate new synthesis to which all amounts to. do that in a self-hosting conversations that are continuous, without being synchronous, evergreen, permanent, always re-sumable reusable, remixable re-volutioable, learnable mutual learning symmathesy

universal reuse is an impossibility

reuse like use is situated pick an adjacent existing delivered use case

instead need to intentionalize conceptualize

symmathesize #Symmathesy Mutual Learning

common "use cases" and do that in a form that is amenable to be tinkered reused and repurposed for future purposes intents as they arise

in any situation there are core intents that are universal

ensure that "data" is captured along with the means of supporting those intents across all conceivable "constellations" for provisioning

ranging from local first, personal first, to in house closed silos to global interplanetary scales open or closed, taking into account delivery platforms desktop mobile metaverse whatever

https://hyp.is/xb0pkOoSEeyRaQudeRD78g/www.linkedin.com/posts/alanmorrisontoday-i-attended-a-thought-provoking-conversation-activity-6940722530403983360-fCeE/?utmsource=linkedinshare&utmmedium=memberdesktopweb

This is an ambition like Descartes' Mathesis Universalis

not to be accomplished by any one man,

And in fact what we are after is a n engine for

symmathesy">Symmathesy

https://indylab-2022.fission.app/hyp?symmathesy

Mutual Learning

communal values

self-development

intellectual curiosity

peer-learning

symmathesy

mutual learning

An exploration of the different ways people think could be a really cool and positive tool for evolving toward greater compassion for one another.

discourse graph

human synthesys

effective synthesis

prudent move to avoid stating synthesis of what, clearly knowledge won't do, even understanding is too limited. Symmathesy would be broad and appropriate enough but intoducing the concept itself is non -trivivila just saying mutual learning mway not suffice

trackback

holding together

contextual timbre

4 IndyWeb

seeking is believing

timebindings

name it

the word matters

matter mutters

words matter

narrowing our ability

assembled systems

beyond Semantics: Mutual Learning symmathesy

and it ceased to be a semantic angine it will be an angine for symmathesy

meaning/intent/salience

ideas as in ...

Semantic is just a deeply limiting conception

More important is Symmathesy (mutual learning) and articulating your tacit subsidiary awareness by capturing the insistent intent

• purppose
• aspect
• relevance
• significance

connections as we write right on the page where we are writing to think and link

ex(plicate!ternalize) your indyvidual intellect share and collaborate to form externalization of commons based peer produced inter intellect

Add in line plain text mark in notation we call TrailMarks the mark the trails in your thinking with contextualizing clues, listicles of content and other clues. (add in line clues using TrailMarks mark

The above has been more aspirational at the time then delivered. We did not have the words for it, but we were aiming to support (Mind)Graph based open research, mutual learning commons: symmathesy. WikiNizer Research had worked well in a Personal context. The Graph Model only supported propositional trails. Having experimented with turning this paper into propositional trails taught us that is just not the way togo. Needed instead to figure out how to capture and co-evolve salience and deep provanance in HyperMaps of Meaning, that are the territory of emergent inter extellect that can augment inter inter intellect. Realized that we need to go beyond that.

Needed to invent a new way of conceptualizing graphs as MindGraph by designing a new mark-in notation we call TrailMarks a way to in-notate HTML Hypermedia to create and trails of all kinds: annotation, presentation, effective conceptualizations, intents and anything else any cone think of that serves their purpose

beter still

a place for mutual learning symmathesy">symmathesy

symmathesy

networked learning environments

symmathesy">symmathesy

from LinkedIn comment epicycles of annotations upon comments and annotations

symmathesy">Symmathesy

mutal learing/arising

At the Edge of Knowl'edge Human Interbeings inter(Articulate|pret) Tacit Awareness loitering with Intent

Symmathesy

John Alan in the Anatamoy of Lisp wrote: The advantage of high level languages is

notational

rather than

computational

what this leads to if you take the long term view and take the long view and treat all engagement in building systems as an opportunity for mutual learning

symmathesy">Symmathesy

and insist that a full, personally attributable trail of provenance is maintained and recapitualted on conceptually clarifying inter personal Mind Graph to capture all associated learning

by capturint the intertwingularity of concepts as we seek to render them effective instead of redoing things we need to seek opportinities to resume work always in a state where the most advanced distilled understanding can be borught to mind as needed

Graphics does need updating Add Web 3 protocols based on DHTs protocols like IPFS, IPLD

So much to say here, no time

Web 3 brings Named Data Networks to the Web

Content addressability means that the Network is the Database, and in fact is the InterNet of Autonomous Ambient InterPersonal Intentional Software (as a conversation) and Symmathesy Mutual Learning

Actually Web 4 is that!

https://hyp.is/xFObQprCEeyEJ2VNolGuA/www.reddit.com/r/holochain/comments/n9glca/holochainvstheinternetcomputerprotocol/

how could communities share their learning

symmathesy across communities

If you get your conceptualization of the problem/task at hand right solutions will take of themselves.

Getting to such cooncepts is a matter of Symmathesy Mutual Learning

synthesizing thinking throught writing

and collaboration

mutual learning symmathesy

https://twitter.com/TrailMarks/status/1449991950690623490

The IndieVerse will do the job of people-sourcing a better maps of understanding the Web frontier by combining a people-centered autonomous spontaneously emergent InterPlanetary InterPersonal network connecting people via shared interests to ideas true Symmathesy

• meta : and here is an example of annnotating the annotations

• for : The Endless Frontier

of all Human endevour not just science but Life, the Universe and Everthing where Man IS the measure of Everthing

https://hyp.is/JecjXmx7EeyEj2Mvtq0ZjA/www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm

The IndieVerse will do the job of people-sourcing a better maps of understanding the Web frontier by combining a people-centered autonomous spontaneously emergent InterPlanetary InterPersonal network connecting people via shared interests to ideas true Symmathesy

• meta : and here is an example of annnotating the annotations

• for : The Endless Frontier

of all Human endevour not just science but Life, the Universe and Everthing where Man IS the measure of Everthing

Human Progress

https://hyp.is/JecjXmx7EeyEj2Mvtq0ZjA/www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm

• about : Collective Problem Solving
• for : Symmathesy
• for : Collective Intellect

not decontectualized nwutered, homogonized distorted claimed to be objective knowledge

https://hyp.is/nxIVuu4lEeuccMhMyrSeg/www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VHsrz0kfc Collective problem solving

• dissent :

we need founders and funders whose sole agenda is to create, share the constellations that embody, by construction, core values of commons based peer production, extensibility, tinkerabality autnonomy of all participants to roll their own everything

makeit easy to emulate compelling to do.

Unenclosable, built from trust for trust.

Full provenance and dynamic shared symmathesy

creating a habitable world like LISP and SmallTalk and HyperCard is the wholly grail. Could it be done without landing with an image.

Can we have intentional transparency? Create software as a conversation. Symmathesy! I know it can be done.

Can it be done in a way that (re)presents ideas as evolution so that self-aware versions can be cultivated? And of course make it born interopearble,

keybase://chat/complexweekend.public#explore-symmathesy/12

a fith scenario: The IndieVerse

Share P2P dynamics but Flip Netarchical Capital: give control over

• governance
• ownership
• design
• protocol

value creators benefit first.

render boundaryless mobilization at scale possible

Symmathesy = Software/Knowledge Commons

generate counter-power

• about : wisdom stack take two

the widom stack implements symmathesy

https://hypothes.is/a/uF6hPaYEeuEfvAXJ5DFg

I would venture to say Everything I care about is a conversation for Symmathesy mutual learning

Software is a conversation

What we need is the ability to

contextualize conversations in curated context associative complexes of ideas, knowledge for knowledge synthesis

and expand curated context with further conversations aimed at interpersonal knowledge synthesis and sharing

and of course everything gets two way meaningful/intentful two way links

symbolic unity

the rapid learning network is implementing symmathesy

• about : hyperverse
• from : https://hypothes.is/a/ySxibvQHEeuKr_-iXF46Wg symmathesy web3 overlay

symmathesy-drawing.jpg?w=1089&ssl=1" alt="" />

evolution interrelationality parts and whole misleading

• see also : intertwingularity holon

Nora Bateson mututla learning within living contexts

"Symmathesy (Noun): An entity composed by contextual mutual learning through interaction. This process of interaction and mutual learning takes place in living entities at larger or smaller scales of symmathesy.

Symmathesy (Verb): to interact within multiple variables to produce a mutual learning context." (https://norabateson.wordpress.com/2015/11/03/symmathesy-a-word-in-progress/)